Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chico to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Chico, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Chico (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 90,660 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $43,253 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $286,700 | $322,800 |
| White | 82% | 36% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 10% |
| With Kids | 25% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 32 |
| Rentals | 55% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chico or South San Jose Hills?
A: Chico has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 90660 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chico or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Chico.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chico or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Chico.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Chico does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 55% for Chico versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chico may include: Rohnert-Park, San-Luis-Obispo, and Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z