Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chico to South El Monte
This post compares Chico, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Chico (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 90,660 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $43,253 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $286,700 | $389,400 |
| White | 82% | 59% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 14% |
| With Kids | 25% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 34 |
| Rentals | 55% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chico or South El Monte?
A: Chico has a much larger population count than South El Monte: 90660 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chico or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Chico.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chico or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Chico.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Chico does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 55% for Chico versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chico may include: Rohnert-Park, San-Luis-Obispo, and Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z