Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chico to Pasadena
This post compares Chico, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Chico (city) | Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 90,660 | 141,231 |
Income (median) | $43,253 | $59,401 |
Home Value (median) | $286,700 | $689,700 |
White | 82% | 53% |
Black | 2% | 10% |
Asian | 4% | 16% |
With Kids | 25% | 25% |
Age (median) | 29 | 37 |
Rentals | 55% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chico or Pasadena?
A: Chico has a smaller population count than Pasadena: 90660 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chico or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Chico.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chico or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Chico.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 55% for Chico versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chico may include: Rohnert-Park, San-Luis-Obispo, and Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z