Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ceres to Riverbank
This post compares Ceres, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ceres (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,650 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $37,711 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $218,300 | $247,200 |
| White | 64% | 79% |
| Black | 3% | 0% |
| Asian | 6% | 4% |
| With Kids | 54% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 40% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ceres or Riverbank?
A: Ceres has a larger population count than Riverbank: 47650 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ceres or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Ceres.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ceres or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Ceres.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ceres does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Ceres versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ceres may include: Delano, Los-Banos, and Patterson.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z