Compare-Cities.com
Compare Cathedral City to South San Francisco
This post compares Cathedral City, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Cathedral City (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,733 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $33,790 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $232,400 | $697,400 |
| White | 76% | 33% |
| Black | 3% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 39% |
| With Kids | 35% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
| Rentals | 39% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Cathedral City or South San Francisco?
A: Cathedral City has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 53733 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Cathedral City or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Cathedral City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Cathedral City or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Cathedral City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cathedral City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 39% for Cathedral City versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Cathedral City may include: Fallbrook, Hemet, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z