Compare-Cities.com
Compare Carson to South San Francisco
This post compares Carson, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Carson (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 92,927 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $43,206 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $402,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 28% | 33% |
| Black | 23% | 2% |
| Asian | 26% | 39% |
| With Kids | 37% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 25% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Carson or South San Francisco?
A: Carson has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 92927 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Carson or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Carson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Carson or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Carson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for Carson versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Carson may include: Vallejo, Suisun-City, and Gardena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z