Compare-Cities.com
Compare Carmichael to South San Francisco
This post compares Carmichael, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Carmichael (CDP) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 65,091 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $50,938 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $334,900 | $697,400 |
| White | 80% | 33% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 39% |
| With Kids | 27% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Carmichael or South San Francisco?
A: Carmichael has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 65091 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Carmichael or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Carmichael.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Carmichael or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Carmichael.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Carmichael does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Carmichael versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Carmichael may include: Winter-Gardens, Yucca-Valley, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z