Compare-Cities.com
Compare Carmichael to South Pasadena
This post compares Carmichael, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Carmichael (CDP) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 65,091 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $50,938 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $334,900 | $928,500 |
| White | 80% | 54% |
| Black | 4% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 29% |
| With Kids | 27% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 40 |
| Rentals | 45% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Carmichael or South Pasadena?
A: Carmichael has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 65091 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Carmichael or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Carmichael.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Carmichael or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Carmichael.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Carmichael versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Carmichael may include: Winter-Gardens, Yucca-Valley, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z