Compare-Cities.com
Compare Carmichael to San Bruno
This post compares Carmichael, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Carmichael (CDP) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 65,091 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $50,938 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $334,900 | $754,700 |
| White | 80% | 49% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 28% |
| With Kids | 27% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Carmichael or San Bruno?
A: Carmichael has a larger population count than San Bruno: 65091 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Carmichael or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Carmichael.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Carmichael or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Carmichael.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Carmichael does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for Carmichael versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Carmichael may include: Winter-Gardens, Yucca-Valley, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z