Compare-Cities.com
Compare Campbell to South San Francisco
This post compares Campbell, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Campbell (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,164 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $76,436 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $884,600 | $697,400 |
| White | 65% | 33% |
| Black | 3% | 2% |
| Asian | 18% | 39% |
| With Kids | 30% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 50% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Campbell or South San Francisco?
A: Campbell has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 41164 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Campbell or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Campbell.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Campbell or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Campbell.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Campbell does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 50% for Campbell versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Campbell may include: Redondo-Beach, San-Mateo, and Redwood-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z