Compare-Cities.com
Compare Campbell to South Pasadena
This post compares Campbell, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Campbell (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,164 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $76,436 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $884,600 | $928,500 |
| White | 65% | 54% |
| Black | 3% | 3% |
| Asian | 18% | 29% |
| With Kids | 30% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 50% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Campbell or South Pasadena?
A: Campbell has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 41164 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Campbell or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Campbell.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Campbell or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Campbell.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 50% for Campbell versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Campbell may include: Redondo-Beach, San-Mateo, and Redwood-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z