Compare-Cities.com
Compare Campbell to Pasadena
This post compares Campbell, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Campbell (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,164 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $76,436 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $884,600 | $689,700 |
| White | 65% | 53% |
| Black | 3% | 10% |
| Asian | 18% | 16% |
| With Kids | 30% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 37 |
| Rentals | 50% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Campbell or Pasadena?
A: Campbell has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 41164 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Campbell or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Campbell.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Campbell or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Campbell.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 50% for Campbell versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Campbell may include: Redondo-Beach, San-Mateo, and Redwood-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z