Compare-Cities.com
Compare Campbell to Bakersfield
This post compares Campbell, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Campbell (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,164 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $76,436 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $884,600 | $228,400 |
| White | 65% | 68% |
| Black | 3% | 7% |
| Asian | 18% | 7% |
| With Kids | 30% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 30 |
| Rentals | 50% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Campbell or Bakersfield?
A: Campbell has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 41164 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Campbell or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Campbell.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Campbell or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Campbell.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Campbell does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 50% for Campbell versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Campbell may include: Redondo-Beach, San-Mateo, and Redwood-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z