Compare-Cities.com
Compare Calexico to South San Francisco
This post compares Calexico, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Calexico (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,953 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $32,231 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $182,900 | $697,400 |
| White | 78% | 33% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 0% | 39% |
| With Kids | 49% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 47% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Calexico or South San Francisco?
A: Calexico has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 39953 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Calexico or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Calexico.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Calexico or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Calexico.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Calexico does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 47% for Calexico versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Calexico may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Brawley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z