Compare-Cities.com
Compare Calexico to South Pasadena
This post compares Calexico, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Calexico (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,953 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $32,231 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $182,900 | $928,500 |
| White | 78% | 54% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 0% | 29% |
| With Kids | 49% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 47% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Calexico or South Pasadena?
A: Calexico has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 39953 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Calexico or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Calexico.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Calexico or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Calexico.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 47% for Calexico versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Calexico may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Brawley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z