Compare-Cities.com
Compare Calabasas to South San Francisco
This post compares Calabasas, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Calabasas (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,169 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $88,351 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $976,300 | $697,400 |
| White | 82% | 33% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 9% | 39% |
| With Kids | 36% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 39 |
| Rentals | 30% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Calabasas or South San Francisco?
A: Calabasas has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 24169 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Calabasas or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Calabasas.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Calabasas or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Calabasas.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Calabasas versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Calabasas may include: Agoura-Hills, San-Clemente, and Carlsbad.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z