Compare-Cities.com
Compare Calabasas to Foothill Farms
This post compares Calabasas, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Calabasas (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,169 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $88,351 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $976,300 | $201,200 |
| White | 82% | 67% |
| Black | 0% | 9% |
| Asian | 9% | 5% |
| With Kids | 36% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 33 |
| Rentals | 30% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Calabasas or Foothill Farms?
A: Calabasas has a smaller population count than Foothill Farms: 24169 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Calabasas or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Calabasas.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Calabasas or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Calabasas.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Calabasas versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Calabasas may include: Agoura-Hills, San-Clemente, and Carlsbad.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z