Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burlingame to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Burlingame, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burlingame (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,401 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $93,145 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,591,600 | $322,800 |
| White | 61% | 36% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 24% | 10% |
| With Kids | 33% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 32 |
| Rentals | 52% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burlingame or South San Jose Hills?
A: Burlingame has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 30401 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burlingame or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burlingame.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burlingame or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Burlingame.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burlingame does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for Burlingame versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burlingame may include: Menlo-Park, Belmont, and Palo-Alto.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z