Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burlingame to South San Francisco
This post compares Burlingame, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burlingame (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,401 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $93,145 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,591,600 | $697,400 |
| White | 61% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 24% | 39% |
| With Kids | 33% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 52% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burlingame or South San Francisco?
A: Burlingame has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 30401 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burlingame or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burlingame.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burlingame or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Burlingame.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burlingame does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for Burlingame versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burlingame may include: Menlo-Park, Belmont, and Palo-Alto.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z