Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burlingame to South El Monte
This post compares Burlingame, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burlingame (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,401 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $93,145 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,591,600 | $389,400 |
| White | 61% | 59% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 24% | 14% |
| With Kids | 33% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 34 |
| Rentals | 52% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burlingame or South El Monte?
A: Burlingame has a larger population count than South El Monte: 30401 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burlingame or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burlingame.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burlingame or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Burlingame.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 52% for Burlingame versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burlingame may include: Menlo-Park, Belmont, and Palo-Alto.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z