Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burlingame to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Burlingame, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burlingame (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,401 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $93,145 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,591,600 | $633,400 |
| White | 61% | 75% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 24% | 13% |
| With Kids | 33% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 52% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burlingame or Pleasant Hill?
A: Burlingame has a similar population count than Pleasant Hill: 30401 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burlingame or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Burlingame.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burlingame or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Burlingame.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burlingame does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for Burlingame versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burlingame may include: Menlo-Park, Belmont, and Palo-Alto.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z