Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burlingame to Pico Rivera
This post compares Burlingame, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burlingame (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,401 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $93,145 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,591,600 | $380,200 |
| White | 61% | 55% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 24% | 3% |
| With Kids | 33% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 36 |
| Rentals | 52% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burlingame or Pico Rivera?
A: Burlingame has a much smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 30401 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burlingame or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burlingame.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burlingame or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Burlingame.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burlingame does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for Burlingame versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burlingame may include: Menlo-Park, Belmont, and Palo-Alto.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z