Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burlingame to Palm Springs
This post compares Burlingame, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burlingame (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,401 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $93,145 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,591,600 | $340,600 |
| White | 61% | 83% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 24% | 4% |
| With Kids | 33% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 54 |
| Rentals | 52% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burlingame or Palm Springs?
A: Burlingame has a smaller population count than Palm Springs: 30401 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burlingame or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burlingame.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burlingame or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Burlingame.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burlingame does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for Burlingame versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burlingame may include: Menlo-Park, Belmont, and Palo-Alto.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z