Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burlingame to Lancaster
This post compares Burlingame, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burlingame (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,401 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $93,145 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,591,600 | $213,100 |
| White | 61% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 21% |
| Asian | 24% | 4% |
| With Kids | 33% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 32 |
| Rentals | 52% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burlingame or Lancaster?
A: Burlingame has a much smaller population count than Lancaster: 30401 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burlingame or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burlingame.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burlingame or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Burlingame.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burlingame does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 52% for Burlingame versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burlingame may include: Menlo-Park, Belmont, and Palo-Alto.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z