Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burlingame to Foster City
This post compares Burlingame, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burlingame (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,401 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $93,145 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,591,600 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 61% | 43% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 24% | 47% |
| With Kids | 33% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 40 |
| Rentals | 52% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burlingame or Foster City?
A: Burlingame has a similar population count than Foster City: 30401 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burlingame or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Burlingame.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burlingame or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Burlingame.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burlingame does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for Burlingame versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burlingame may include: Menlo-Park, Belmont, and Palo-Alto.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z