Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burlingame to Foothill Farms
This post compares Burlingame, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burlingame (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,401 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $93,145 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,591,600 | $201,200 |
| White | 61% | 67% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 24% | 5% |
| With Kids | 33% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 33 |
| Rentals | 52% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burlingame or Foothill Farms?
A: Burlingame has a similar population count than Foothill Farms: 30401 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burlingame or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burlingame.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burlingame or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Burlingame.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burlingame does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 52% for Burlingame versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burlingame may include: Menlo-Park, Belmont, and Palo-Alto.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z