Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burlingame to Chino Hills
This post compares Burlingame, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burlingame (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,401 | 78,025 |
| Income (median) | $93,145 | $66,607 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,591,600 | $567,200 |
| White | 61% | 46% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 24% | 33% |
| With Kids | 33% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 38 |
| Rentals | 52% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burlingame or Chino Hills?
A: Burlingame has a much smaller population count than Chino Hills: 30401 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burlingame or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burlingame.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burlingame or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Burlingame.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burlingame does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for Burlingame versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burlingame may include: Menlo-Park, Belmont, and Palo-Alto.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z