Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Burbank, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $322,800 |
| White | 70% | 36% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 10% |
| With Kids | 27% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 57% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or South San Jose Hills?
A: Burbank has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 104765 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z