Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to South San Francisco
This post compares Burbank, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $697,400 |
| White | 70% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 11% | 39% |
| With Kids | 27% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 57% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or South San Francisco?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 104765 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z