Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to San Mateo
This post compares Burbank, California to San Mateo, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | San Mateo (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 103,500 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $75,635 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $921,700 |
| White | 70% | 57% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 11% | 22% |
| With Kids | 27% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 57% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or San Mateo?
A: Burbank has a similar population count than San Mateo: 104765 compared with 103500 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in San Mateo?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or San Mateo?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 45% for San Mateo.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z