Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to San Francisco
This post compares Burbank, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $927,400 |
| White | 70% | 47% |
| Black | 2% | 5% |
| Asian | 11% | 34% |
| With Kids | 27% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 57% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or San Francisco?
A: Burbank has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 104765 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 57% for Burbank versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z