Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to San Bruno
This post compares Burbank, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $754,700 |
| White | 70% | 49% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 28% |
| With Kids | 27% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 57% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or San Bruno?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than San Bruno: 104765 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z