Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Burbank, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $444,200 |
| White | 70% | 62% |
| Black | 2% | 9% |
| Asian | 11% | 13% |
| With Kids | 27% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 35 |
| Rentals | 57% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Burbank has a smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 104765 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z