Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Burbank, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $633,400 |
| White | 70% | 75% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 13% |
| With Kids | 27% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 57% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Pleasant Hill?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than Pleasant Hill: 104765 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z