Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Pittsburg
This post compares Burbank, California to Pittsburg, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Pittsburg (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 69,449 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $46,928 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $324,500 |
| White | 70% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 16% |
| Asian | 11% | 17% |
| With Kids | 27% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 35 |
| Rentals | 57% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Pittsburg?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than Pittsburg: 104765 compared with 69449 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Pittsburg?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Pittsburg?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 43% for Pittsburg.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z