Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Pico Rivera
This post compares Burbank, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $380,200 |
| White | 70% | 55% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 11% | 3% |
| With Kids | 27% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 36 |
| Rentals | 57% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Pico Rivera?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than Pico Rivera: 104765 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z