Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Petaluma
This post compares Burbank, California to Petaluma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Petaluma (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 60,210 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $63,243 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $556,900 |
| White | 70% | 78% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 11% | 4% |
| With Kids | 27% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 41 |
| Rentals | 57% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Petaluma?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than Petaluma: 104765 compared with 60210 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Petaluma?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Petaluma?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 33% for Petaluma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z