Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Oakland
This post compares Burbank, California to Oakland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Oakland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 417,442 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $52,981 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $564,500 |
| White | 70% | 36% |
| Black | 2% | 24% |
| Asian | 11% | 15% |
| With Kids | 27% | 28% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 36 |
| Rentals | 57% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Oakland?
A: Burbank has a much smaller population count than Oakland: 104765 compared with 417442 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Oakland?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Oakland?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Oakland does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 57% for Burbank versus 60% for Oakland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z