Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Los Angeles
This post compares Burbank, California to Los Angeles, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Los Angeles (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 3,949,776 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $40,932 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $549,800 |
| White | 70% | 52% |
| Black | 2% | 8% |
| Asian | 11% | 11% |
| With Kids | 27% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 35 |
| Rentals | 57% | 63% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Los Angeles?
A: Burbank has a much smaller population count than Los Angeles: 104765 compared with 3949776 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Los Angeles?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Los Angeles?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 57% for Burbank versus 63% for Los Angeles.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z