Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Livermore
This post compares Burbank, California to Livermore, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Livermore (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 88,232 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $75,750 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $643,200 |
| White | 70% | 78% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 10% |
| With Kids | 27% | 36% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 57% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Livermore?
A: Burbank has a similar population count than Livermore: 104765 compared with 88232 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Livermore?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Livermore?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 28% for Livermore.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z