Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Lancaster
This post compares Burbank, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $213,100 |
| White | 70% | 62% |
| Black | 2% | 21% |
| Asian | 11% | 4% |
| With Kids | 27% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 57% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Lancaster?
A: Burbank has a smaller population count than Lancaster: 104765 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z