Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Laguna Hills
This post compares Burbank, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $649,700 |
| White | 70% | 69% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 11% | 14% |
| With Kids | 27% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 41 |
| Rentals | 57% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Laguna Hills?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than Laguna Hills: 104765 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z