Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to La Verne
This post compares Burbank, California to La Verne, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | La Verne (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 32,320 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $57,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $535,900 |
| White | 70% | 74% |
| Black | 2% | 4% |
| Asian | 11% | 7% |
| With Kids | 27% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 43 |
| Rentals | 57% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or La Verne?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than La Verne: 104765 compared with 32320 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in La Verne?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or La Verne?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 25% for La Verne.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z