Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Irvine
This post compares Burbank, California to Irvine, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Irvine (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 256,877 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $81,453 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $753,400 |
| White | 70% | 47% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 41% |
| With Kids | 27% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 34 |
| Rentals | 57% | 51% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Irvine?
A: Burbank has a much smaller population count than Irvine: 104765 compared with 256877 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Irvine?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Irvine?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 57% for Burbank versus 51% for Irvine.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z