Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Glendale
This post compares Burbank, California to Glendale, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Burbank (city) | Glendale (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 104,765 | 199,750 |
Income (median) | $57,804 | $51,410 |
Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $675,300 |
White | 70% | 72% |
Black | 2% | 1% |
Asian | 11% | 15% |
With Kids | 27% | 28% |
Age (median) | 39 | 41 |
Rentals | 57% | 66% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Glendale?
A: Burbank has a smaller population count than Glendale: 104765 compared with 199750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Glendale?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Glendale?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Glendale does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 57% for Burbank versus 66% for Glendale.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z