Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Fresno
This post compares Burbank, California to Fresno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Fresno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 519,037 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $39,069 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $206,800 |
| White | 70% | 56% |
| Black | 2% | 7% |
| Asian | 11% | 13% |
| With Kids | 27% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 30 |
| Rentals | 57% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Fresno?
A: Burbank has a much smaller population count than Fresno: 104765 compared with 519037 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Fresno?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Fresno?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 57% for Burbank versus 53% for Fresno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z