Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Foster City
This post compares Burbank, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 70% | 43% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 11% | 47% |
| With Kids | 27% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 57% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Foster City?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than Foster City: 104765 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z