Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Foothill Farms
This post compares Burbank, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $201,200 |
| White | 70% | 67% |
| Black | 2% | 9% |
| Asian | 11% | 5% |
| With Kids | 27% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 33 |
| Rentals | 57% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Foothill Farms?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 104765 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z