Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Folsom
This post compares Burbank, California to Folsom, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Burbank (city) | Folsom (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 104,765 | 75,897 |
Income (median) | $57,804 | $84,884 |
Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $456,600 |
White | 70% | 69% |
Black | 2% | 4% |
Asian | 11% | 16% |
With Kids | 27% | 38% |
Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
Rentals | 57% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Folsom?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than Folsom: 104765 compared with 75897 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Folsom?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Folsom?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 30% for Folsom.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z