Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Fairfield
This post compares Burbank, California to Fairfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Fairfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 112,790 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $51,969 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $341,500 |
| White | 70% | 46% |
| Black | 2% | 14% |
| Asian | 11% | 17% |
| With Kids | 27% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 34 |
| Rentals | 57% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Fairfield?
A: Burbank has a similar population count than Fairfield: 104765 compared with 112790 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Fairfield?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Fairfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 44% for Fairfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z